Archive > May 2012

Another Important Victory For Health Care Providers

admin » 16 May 2012 » In General Law, PIP, Personal Injury Protection » No Comments

In a decision rendered on May 15, 2012, the Massachusetts Appeals Court has ruled that an automobile insurance company CAN NOT use an unreliable database to reduce a health care providers medical bills.  In the case of N.E. Physical Therapy v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 11-P-1452, the three member panel of the Appeals Court held that “Ingenix data lacked the requisite indicia of reliability to be admissible evidence.”

Liberty Mutual’s insured was injured in a car accident in 2003 and sought physical therapy with N.E. Physical Therapy Plus, Inc. (NEPT).  NEPT billed Liberty $4,465.00 for the services rendered.  Liberty did not dispute the necessity of the services, however, it only paid $3,730.68 based solely on Liberty’s internal assessment, using a third-party database known as Ingenix.  Liberty claimed that, based upon the Ingenix database of medical charges, NEPT’s bills were unreasonable.

The Ingenix database, according to the decision, consists of a collection of medical charges, voluntarily reported by various insurance companies including Liberty and other insurers, which reflects an “ambiguous ‘cost’ of a specified service in a particular geographic region.”  Ingenix then uses a “relative value scale” to convert the raw data into derivative charges.

NEPT sued Liberty for the outstanding balance of $734.32 and won at the district court level.  Liberty appealed and lost again at the Appellate Division of the District Court.  Liberty appealed again to the three member panel of the Massachusetts Appeals Court.

The Appeals Court confirmed what the Appellate Division found regarding Ingenix and the fact that the database was voluntarily provided by only some insurers, that Ingenix disclaimed audit controls, that Ingenix failed to certify the accuracy of the information, and that the data was simply unreliable.  At the Appeals Court level, Liberty argued that the data was reliable and admissible under M.G.L. c. 233, § 79B (Fact statements published for persons in a particular occupation).  However, based upon the previous decision in Davekos v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 2008 Mass.App.Div. 32 (2008), the Appeals Court held that the underlying unreliability of the Ingenix database made it inadmissible at trial.

This is a HUGE victory for those who provide medical services to people injured in motor vehicle accidents.  Insurance companies can no longer use databases, such as Ingenix, which have insufficient reliability, to reduce bills.

If you have any questions about this case or any other matters, please contact Attorney Robert Mazow at rem@helpinginjured.com.

Continue reading...

Can an unborn fetus be subject to a wrongful death claim?

admin » 15 May 2012 » In General Law, Personal Injury Protection, Wrongful Death » No Comments

Within the state of Massachusetts the law recognizes the fact that an unborn child, a fetus, has recourse when they are killed or murdered due to an intentional act, an accident, a collision. If an injury is suffered by a women a carrying child and she loses that child, there may be a cause of action there. It’s important to consult with an attorney about that cause of action.

Contact a Massachusetts Personal Injury Lawyer

My name is Kevin McCullough, with the law offices of Mazow and McCullough. If you have been injured, you need legal assistance, you have questions, you deserve answers to those questions and you deserve the best. Call our offices.

Continue reading...

Dole Salad Recalled Due to Salmonella Contamination

admin » 03 May 2012 » In Food Borne Illness, Uncategorized » No Comments

Dole Food Company is issuing a food recall on their bagged salad.  The specific bagged salad that is being recalled is called Seven Lettuces Salad.  Recently, a random sample testing of the salad was conducted in New York and it came up positive for Salmonella, prompting the recall.

The bags of salad that are affected by this recall have a UPC code of 71430 01057 and product codes of 0577N089112A and 0577N089112B.  The bagged salad also has a use by date of April 11, 2012 stamped on the upper right hand corner of the package.

As of yet, no illnesses have been reported.  If anyone has a bag of salad that has been affected by the recall, it is urged that you throw it out.

Salmonella poisoning can be severe or life threatening to children, the elderly and pregnant women.  Some symptoms of salmonella are diarrhea, fever and abdominal cramps within 72 hours of eating contaminated foods.

If you or a loved one has been the victim of a food borne illness, or if you have any questions about a salmonella outbreak in your state, contact the personal injury lawyers at Mazow/McCullough, P.C. for a free consultation. You can contact us at 978-744-8000 or info@helpinginjured.com.

The right lawyer makes all the difference.

Continue reading...